Triple chocolate

This really belongs with the “bigger is better” series – the same desires that drive people to drink 900 some odd milliliters of coffee drives them to triple up not realizing that there can be too much of a good thing.  There is a tendency here in the US to believe that if, for example, chocolate is good, the double chocolate is better and triple chocolate is even better than that.

It generally seems to stop at triple, quadruple apparently is a little excessive – even for the bigger is better crowd.

Triple chocolate, mouse etc cake, pic:

That leave us very often with lots of something generally good – like chocolate – but at a bad quality.  Good triple chocolate – or anything – comes at a price but since people want lots and cheap, that is what they get: huge portions of triple something that nobody really wants to eat because it does not taste all that great but since it is on a plate right in front of you already, you eat it.  All of it or at least most of it.

Overblown portions of mediocre quality are the rule.  Every time I go to Europe, or Australia for that matter (as I just discovered) I need to adjust my internal portion-size calibrator and tell my self that the little thingy on my plate, made from delicious dark Swiss or belgian chocolate is so much more satisfying than the “Great Wall of China triple chocolate delight” at the Chinese restauarant around the corner.

It’s always hard at first, just like getting used to not eating the huge portions of whatever – jus because they are there.



Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: